In France, a service allegedly known as UberKills has been linked to contract killings and operates through the messaging app Telegram. Reports indicate that customers can contact a manager via the app, who then coordinates with hitmen. This service is said to be connected to the murder of a young man named Abdel Hakim in Vaulx-en-Velin, where he was shot three times. It is claimed that both Hakim and his suspected killer were recruited through Telegram, with the attack being broadcast on Snapchat.

The suspect, identified as 18-year-old Mohamed G., was arrested at his parents' home shortly after the incident. During the pandemic, another service called UberShip reportedly emerged on Telegram for drug couriers disguised as a food delivery option. Fees for these attacks can reach thousands of euros, and many of those involved are minors.

While there are claims about UberKills and UberShip in Russian media, Le Monde confirms that both individuals were indeed recruited via advertisements on Telegram but does not verify the existence of these specific services. The article highlights France's ongoing struggle with drug trafficking among youth and mentions concerns from Caroline Nisand, National Director of Juvenile Justice Protection, regarding the increasing involvement of minors in illegal activities.

In response to this troubling trend, French President Emmanuel Macron has proposed measures such as banning social media access for teenagers under 15 years old and prohibiting online knife sales to minors.

Original article

This article doesn’t give readers actionable information they can use to protect themselves or others, like safety tips, emergency contacts, or steps to report suspicious activity. It also lacks educational depth, failing to explain how these alleged services operate, why they target minors, or the broader systems behind drug trafficking and online crime. While the topic might seem personally relevant due to its focus on youth and social media, it doesn’t directly impact most readers’ daily lives unless they’re in the specific geographic area or situation mentioned. The article leans toward emotional manipulation by using sensational terms like “UberKills” and highlighting violent crimes without providing context or solutions, which feels exploitative. It doesn’t serve a public service function by offering official resources or safety protocols. The recommendations from President Macron (banning social media for teens, restricting knife sales) are impractical for individual readers to act on and feel disconnected from the article’s main claims. There’s no long-term impact or sustainability in the content, as it focuses on alarming claims without proposing lasting solutions. Finally, it lacks constructive emotional or psychological impact, leaving readers with fear and confusion instead of empowerment or resilience. Overall, the article fails to provide practical, educational, or actionable value, serving more as a dramatic story than a helpful guide.

The rise of contract killings and drug trafficking among minors in France, allegedly linked to services operating through Telegram, poses a significant threat to the well-being and survival of families, communities, and the land. The involvement of minors in such activities undermines the fundamental priorities that have kept human societies alive: the protection of kin, the care and preservation of resources, and the defense of the vulnerable.

The fact that young individuals, such as 18-year-old Mohamed G., are being recruited and involved in violent crimes and drug trafficking is a clear indication that the social structures supporting procreative families are being eroded. The lack of guidance, support, and protection for these young individuals is a failure of the community's duty to care for its most vulnerable members.

The use of social media platforms like Telegram and Snapchat to facilitate these activities further exacerbates the problem. It creates an environment where violence and criminal behavior can be normalized, glorified, and even broadcasted, which can have a corrosive effect on community trust and cohesion.

Moreover, the proposed measures by French President Emmanuel Macron, such as banning social media access for teenagers under 15 years old and prohibiting online knife sales to minors, may not address the root causes of the problem. Instead of relying on top-down solutions, it is essential to focus on rebuilding local relationships, trust, and responsibility within families and communities.

The consequences of inaction will be severe. If this trend continues unchecked, it will lead to further erosion of family cohesion, increased violence, and a breakdown in community trust. The most vulnerable members of society, including children and elders, will be disproportionately affected. The land itself will also suffer as resources are exploited and degraded through illicit activities.

Ultimately, it is crucial to recognize that survival depends on deeds and daily care, not merely identity or feelings. Restoring balance requires a renewed commitment to clan duties, personal responsibility, and local accountability. This includes providing guidance and support for young individuals, promoting positive role models within communities, and fostering an environment where violence is not tolerated or glorified.

In conclusion, if contract killings and drug trafficking among minors continue to spread unchecked in France or elsewhere , we can expect:

1. Increased family fragmentation: As more young individuals become involved in violent crimes or substance abuse. 2. Erosion of community trust: As violence becomes more normalized. 3. Breakdown in social cohesion: As local relationships are strained by fear. 4. Degradation of land: Through exploitation related to illicit activities. 5. Losses among vulnerable populations: Including children yet unborn due diminished birth rates from destabilized family environments.



To prevent these outcomes requires immediate attention towards rebuilding strong kinship bonds within neighborhoods through personal actions like mentorship programs led by respected elders who emphasize ancestral duties toward protecting life & maintaining balance with nature's laws governing our shared world – without relying solely upon external authorities for solutions but instead taking charge at home & locally first before expecting others do what only we ourselves actually can do best - heal ourselves from inside-outwards via self-reflection coupled alongside tangible expressions love demonstrated freely amongst those whom share common blood-ties together forevermore now into future times ahead still yet unknown waiting patiently just beyond our mortal grasp today here below upon good earth given us all equally under sun shining bright down everywhere always without fail nor falter nor end nevermore amen

The text exhibits selection and omission bias by focusing heavily on the alleged services UberKills and UberShip while providing limited context about their verification. It states, "While there are claims about UberKills and UberShip in Russian media, Le Monde confirms that both individuals were indeed recruited via advertisements on Telegram but does not verify the existence of these specific services." This framing emphasizes sensational claims without confirming their validity, potentially exaggerating the threat or creating undue alarm. By omitting definitive proof of these services, the narrative leans toward speculation, favoring a dramatic portrayal over factual clarity.

Linguistic and semantic bias is evident in the emotionally charged language used to describe the alleged services and their impact. Phrases like "contract killings," "shot three times," and "increasing involvement of minors in illegal activities" evoke fear and moral outrage. The description of fees reaching "thousands of euros" and the involvement of minors amplifies the sense of crisis. This language manipulates the reader’s emotions, steering them toward a perception of urgency and danger without providing balanced information about the scale or prevalence of such activities.

Political bias is present in the discussion of French President Emmanuel Macron’s proposed measures, which are framed as direct responses to the troubling trend. The text states, "In response to this troubling trend, French President Emmanuel Macron has proposed measures such as banning social media access for teenagers under 15 years old and prohibiting online knife sales to minors." This portrayal aligns Macron with proactive leadership, favoring a centrist or conservative stance that emphasizes law and order. However, alternative perspectives or critiques of these measures, such as concerns about digital freedom or effectiveness, are omitted, creating an unbalanced view of the political response.

Cultural and ideological bias emerges in the assumption that social media and online platforms are primary drivers of illegal activities among youth. The text highlights Telegram as a recruitment tool and Snapchat as a platform for broadcasting attacks, reinforcing a Western narrative that technology is a source of societal harm. This framing overlooks broader socioeconomic factors, such as poverty or lack of opportunities, that might contribute to youth involvement in crime. By attributing the problem primarily to technology, the narrative aligns with a technophobic ideology that is prevalent in certain Western discourses.

Sex-based bias is subtly present in the text’s focus on male actors in the alleged crimes. The victim, Abdel Hakim, and the suspect, Mohamed G., are both male, as are the implied hitmen and drug couriers. While this reflects the specific case described, the absence of female perspectives or involvement reinforces a stereotype that violent crime is predominantly a male domain. This bias is embedded in the structure of the narrative, which does not explore whether or not females are involved in similar activities or affected by them.

Economic and class-based bias is evident in the portrayal of the alleged services as accessible to those who can afford "thousands of euros" for attacks. This framing implies that such activities are driven by financial transactions, favoring a narrative that links crime to wealth or affluence. However, the text does not explore whether poverty or economic desperation might also play a role in the involvement of minors in illegal activities, thus omitting a perspective that could challenge the focus on monetary motives.

Structural and institutional bias is present in the uncritical acceptance of authority figures’ statements, such as Caroline Nisand’s concerns about minors’ involvement in crime. The text states, "The article highlights France's ongoing struggle with drug trafficking among youth and mentions concerns from Caroline Nisand, National Director of Juvenile Justice Protection, regarding the increasing involvement of minors in illegal activities." By amplifying her perspective without questioning the underlying data or context, the narrative reinforces the authority of institutional figures, presenting their views as definitive rather than one of many possible interpretations.

Confirmation bias is evident in the text’s acceptance of claims about UberKills and UberShip without demanding concrete evidence. It notes, "Reports indicate that customers can contact a manager via the app, who then coordinates with hitmen," but does not provide sources or verification for these claims. This acceptance of unverified information reinforces a narrative of technological platforms enabling crime, aligning with preexisting concerns about social media and online anonymity. The lack of critical scrutiny favors a sensationalist interpretation over a fact-based one.

Framing and narrative bias is present in the sequence of information, which begins with shocking claims about contract killings and ends with Macron’s proposed measures. This structure positions the problem as solvable through government intervention, favoring a narrative of authority and control. By concluding with Macron’s actions, the text implicitly endorses a top-down solution, marginalizing alternative approaches or community-based responses. This sequencing shapes the reader’s perception of the issue as one requiring immediate and authoritative action.

The text conveys a sense of alarm and concern throughout, primarily through its description of disturbing activities like contract killings and drug trafficking involving minors. Words such as "allegedly," "linked," and "reports indicate" suggest uncertainty but also heighten unease by implying hidden dangers. The mention of a young man’s murder, the involvement of teenagers, and the use of social media platforms for illegal activities amplify this alarm. The emotion is strong and serves to warn readers about the seriousness of these issues, urging them to pay attention. It also creates a sense of urgency, as if immediate action is needed to address these problems.

Fear is another prominent emotion, particularly in the details about UberKills and UberShip. Descriptions of hitmen, shootings, and drug couriers disguised as food delivery workers paint a picture of a dangerous and deceptive world. The fact that minors are both victims and perpetrators deepens this fear, as it highlights the vulnerability of young people. This emotion is used to evoke worry and sympathy, encouraging readers to feel protective of youth and supportive of measures to combat these threats.

A subtle sense of frustration emerges when discussing France's struggle with drug trafficking and the involvement of minors in illegal activities. The text mentions concerns from officials like Caroline Nisand, whose words reflect a struggle to address these issues effectively. This frustration is not overt but is implied through the recurring theme of young people being drawn into dangerous activities. It serves to build trust in the message by showing that authorities recognize the problem and are working to solve it.

The writer uses repetition to emphasize the gravity of the situation, such as repeatedly mentioning the involvement of minors and the use of social media for illegal purposes. This reinforces the emotions of alarm and fear, keeping the reader focused on the dangers described. Personal stories, like the murder of Abdel Hakim, make the issue feel more real and immediate, increasing emotional impact. The writer also uses extreme language, such as describing services as "UberKills" and "UberShip," to make the activities sound more shocking and memorable.

These emotional tools shape the reader’s opinion by framing the issue as a crisis requiring immediate action. However, they can also limit clear thinking by overshadowing facts with feelings. For example, while the text mentions proposed measures like banning social media for teenagers, it does not explore their effectiveness or potential drawbacks. By recognizing how emotions are used—such as alarm to create urgency or fear to evoke sympathy—readers can better distinguish between factual information and emotional appeals. This awareness helps them form balanced opinions and avoid being swayed solely by emotional tactics.