Two undergraduate students were arrested in Kozhikode for possessing approximately 100 LSD stamps and 1.2 grams of hashish oil. The students, identified as Midhun Raj, 22, from Kottayam, studying BCA Cyber Security, and Abhishek Vathedath, 21, from Alappuzha, pursuing a BSc in Information Technology, were taken into custody by the District Anti-Narcotics Special Action Force during a surprise inspection near the railway station.

Authorities reported that the duo was on their way to the railway station after allegedly obtaining the drugs from local dealers. It was noted that they had started engaging in drug trafficking after previously using these substances together. The police are currently conducting a detailed investigation to identify other potential drug dealers and users connected to the students. The seized LSD stamps weighed about 1.69 grams and had an estimated market value of ₹2 lakh.

Original article

This article provides little to no actionable information for the reader. It does not offer concrete steps, survival strategies, safety procedures, or guidance that could influence personal behavior. The article simply reports on a news event without providing any practical advice or recommendations.

The educational depth of the article is also lacking. It does not teach the reader anything meaningful and substantive beyond surface-level facts about a specific incident involving two undergraduate students. There is no explanation of causes, consequences, systems, historical context, technical knowledge, or uncommon information that equips the reader to understand the topic more clearly.

The subject matter of this article has limited personal relevance for most readers. While it may be of interest to those living in Kozhikode or studying in similar fields as the students involved, it is unlikely to impact most readers' real lives directly or indirectly.

The language used in this article engages in sensationalism and emotional manipulation by focusing on the dramatic aspects of the incident rather than providing informative content. The use of terms like "arrested," "possessing approximately 100 LSD stamps," and "hashish oil" creates a sense of danger and excitement without adding much value to the reader's understanding.

The article does not serve any public service function by providing access to official statements, safety protocols, emergency contacts, or resources that readers can use. Instead, it appears to exist solely for entertainment purposes.

Any recommendations or advice provided in this article are vague and impractical. The report states that authorities are conducting an investigation but does not offer any concrete steps for readers to take or guidance on how to stay safe.

The potential for long-term impact and sustainability is also low. The article promotes no behaviors, policies, or knowledge that have lasting positive effects beyond reporting on a single incident.

Finally, this article has a negative constructive emotional impact as it creates fear and anxiety without offering any constructive engagement or positive emotional responses such as resilience or hope.

The actions of these two students, engaging in drug possession and trafficking, pose a significant threat to the well-being and survival of their families and community. By involving themselves in such illicit activities, they not only risk their own lives but also jeopardize the trust and responsibility that are essential to the cohesion of their kinship bonds.

The fact that they were on their way to the railway station, allegedly to distribute the drugs, indicates a blatant disregard for the safety and protection of their peers and community members. Their actions could lead to the harm and exploitation of vulnerable individuals, including children and young adults, who may be exposed to these substances.

Furthermore, their involvement in drug trafficking undermines the social structures that support procreative families and the care of the next generation. The energy and resources that should be dedicated to nurturing and protecting their own families are instead being diverted towards destructive and harmful activities.

The consequences of such behaviors spreading unchecked would be devastating. Families would be torn apart by addiction, violence, and neglect. Children would be left vulnerable to exploitation and harm. Community trust would be shattered, leading to social fragmentation and disintegration. The stewardship of the land would suffer as resources are squandered on destructive pursuits rather than being invested in sustainable practices that ensure the long-term survival of the people.

It is essential for these individuals to take personal responsibility for their actions and acknowledge the harm they have caused. They must make amends through apology, restitution, and a renewed commitment to their clan duties. The community must also come together to address this issue, providing support for those affected by addiction and working towards creating an environment that promotes healthy relationships, responsible behavior, and respect for traditional values.

Ultimately, if such behaviors continue unchecked, the very fabric of our society will be torn apart. The protection of children, elders, and vulnerable members will be compromised. The continuity of our people will be threatened as birth rates decline due to neglect of family responsibilities. It is imperative that we prioritize ancestral duties over destructive impulses, ensuring a future where our children can thrive in safe, supportive communities with strong kinship bonds.

The given text is a news article about two undergraduate students being arrested for possessing LSD stamps and hashish oil. Upon analyzing the text, I have detected several forms of bias and language manipulation.

Virtue Signaling: The text portrays the police as authorities who are conducting a "detailed investigation" to identify other potential drug dealers and users connected to the students. This framing implies that the police are acting in a virtuous manner by taking action against drug trafficking, which may be seen as a moral imperative. However, this portrayal may be biased towards presenting law enforcement in a positive light, without acknowledging potential issues with their methods or motivations.

Gaslighting: The text states that the students "had started engaging in drug trafficking after previously using these substances together." This phrase implies that the students were somehow responsible for their own actions, and that they had control over their decision to engage in drug trafficking. However, this framing may be gaslighting readers into believing that the students were entirely responsible for their actions, without considering external factors such as peer pressure or lack of access to resources.

Rhetorical Techniques: The text uses emotionally charged language when describing the seized LSD stamps as having an "estimated market value of ₹2 lakh." This phrase creates a sense of shock and outrage, implying that the value of these substances is significant enough to warrant attention from law enforcement. However, this framing may be biased towards creating a sense of moral panic around drug use.

Cultural Bias: The text assumes that engaging in drug use is inherently wrong or problematic. This assumption reflects cultural biases around substance use in India, where certain substances like LSD are often stigmatized or viewed as taboo. However, this bias may not account for alternative perspectives on substance use or harm reduction strategies.

Nationalism: The text does not explicitly exhibit nationalist bias; however, it does assume a level of familiarity with local geography (Kozhikode) and cultural context (the mention of railway stations). While these references do not necessarily imply nationalist bias per se, they do reflect an assumption about shared knowledge among readers within India.

Structural Bias: The text presents law enforcement as authorities who are acting in response to a situation involving two individuals engaged in alleged wrongdoing. This framing reflects structural biases around authority systems and gatekeeping structures within Indian society. While it does not explicitly critique these structures, it reinforces them by presenting law enforcement as legitimate actors.

Confirmation Bias: The text presents only one side of the story – namely, that two individuals were arrested for possessing drugs – without providing any context about why they might have been using these substances or what led them to engage in trafficking activities. This selective presentation creates confirmation bias among readers who accept at face value the narrative presented by law enforcement.

Framing and Narrative Bias: The sequence of information presented in the article frames events from beginning to end: first mentioning how authorities took custody of two individuals; then stating what was found on them; followed by details about how they allegedly obtained drugs from local dealers; finally concluding with an investigation into other potential dealers/users connected to them. While this structure provides clear information about events unfolding chronologically from start-to-end regarding those involved within said situation itself - there's no further exploration beyond those specific details provided here.



The sources cited (none mentioned) would likely favor reinforcing narratives around strict anti-drug policies if any were included.



Temporal Bias: There's no explicit discussion regarding historical context surrounding substance abuse behaviors exhibited amongst youth groups during past decades.



When technical data-driven claims aren't made directly within said passage - there isn't any data framed supporting specific ideologies assumptions beliefs either

The input text conveys a range of emotions, from those associated with the actions of the students to the reactions of the authorities and the overall tone of the report. One emotion that stands out is fear, which is subtly conveyed through phrases such as "arrested," "taken into custody," and "detailed investigation." These words create a sense of seriousness and caution, implying that drug trafficking is a serious offense. The fear factor serves to deter readers from engaging in similar activities and to emphasize the gravity of the situation.

Another emotion present in the text is concern or worry, which is evident in the authorities' actions. The District Anti-Narcotics Special Action Force conducted a surprise inspection near the railway station, indicating that they are proactive in combating drug trafficking. This shows that they are committed to keeping their community safe and suggests that readers should be concerned about this issue as well.

The text also conveys a sense of disapproval or disappointment towards Midhun Raj and Abhishek Vathedath for their involvement in drug trafficking. Phrases such as "engaging in drug trafficking" and "obtaining drugs from local dealers" have negative connotations, implying that their actions were wrong. This disapproval serves to distance readers from these individuals' behavior and reinforce societal norms against drug use.

In contrast, there is no apparent emotional connection or sympathy towards Midhun Raj and Abhishek Vathedath as individuals. Their personal stories or motivations are not explored, which might have created empathy with readers who could relate to their circumstances.

The writer uses various tools to create an emotional impact on readers. For instance, repeating key phrases like "drug trafficking" emphasizes its severity and importance. The comparison between 1.69 grams of LSD stamps having an estimated market value of ₹2 lakh creates a sense of scale, making it easier for readers to understand why this issue matters.

Furthermore, using specific details like names (Midhun Raj), ages (22), locations (Kottayam), courses (BCA Cyber Security), creates vivid mental images for readers while also avoiding sensationalism by grounding these details within real-life contexts.

However, knowing where emotions are used can help readers stay informed about facts versus feelings by recognizing when language becomes more emotive than informative – e.g., when describing quantities ("approximately 100 LSD stamps") versus emotive descriptions ("serious offense").