Police Scotland confirmed that the fatal shootings of two Glaswegians, Ross Monaghan and Eddie Lyons Junior, in Fuengirola, Spain, were not orchestrated from Scotland. The incident occurred on May 31 at Monaghan's Bar around 11:30 PM. Both men were reportedly targeted by a member of the rival Daniel gang from Glasgow.

Following the shooting, Spanish authorities indicated that the attack was carried out by a professional killer affiliated with this rival gang. Police Scotland acknowledged this statement but maintained that there was no evidence linking the incident to ongoing gang violence in Scotland or suggesting it was planned from there.

Assistant Chief Constable Stuart Houston stated that Police Scotland had been assisting Spanish authorities with their investigation and reiterated their position regarding a lack of evidence connecting the murders to criminal activities in Scotland. He mentioned an arrest made in Merseyside related to the case and expressed continued support for Spanish investigators as needed.

Spanish police described how Lyons Junior was shot while sitting outside the bar; his assailant's weapon jammed during the attack, allowing Monaghan to attempt escape inside before being pursued and shot as well. The gunman fled through a train tunnel and subsequently traveled to Portugal before returning to England, where he changed addresses multiple times before being apprehended under an international arrest warrant issued by Spain.

The suspect has not been formally named but is reported to be a 44-year-old English man. He appeared at Westminster Magistrates Court for extradition proceedings following his arrest by Merseyside Police on June 14. Spanish authorities have requested his extradition for further legal action related to this double murder case.

Original article

The provided text is a news article about a double murder case in Fuengirola, Spain, involving two Glasgow men. Upon close examination, several biases and manipulations become apparent.

One of the most striking biases is the implicit nationalism and xenophobia present in the article. The use of "Glaswegians" to describe the victims creates a sense of community and shared identity, while also subtly emphasizing their Scottish heritage. This framing serves to create a narrative of Scottish victimhood, which may elicit sympathy from readers. In contrast, the perpetrator is described as an English man with no similar nationalistic label attached to him. This omission creates an implicit distinction between "us" (Scottish) and "them" (English), reinforcing a nationalist bias.

Furthermore, the article employs linguistic bias through its use of emotionally charged language. Words like "fatal shootings," "targeted," and "professional killer" create a sense of drama and danger, drawing the reader into the narrative. The phrase "rival Daniel gang from Glasgow" also implies a level of sophistication and organization, which may be intended to heighten tension or create fear. Such language choices contribute to an atmosphere of sensationalism, which can influence readers' perceptions and reactions.

The text also exhibits structural bias through its selection and omission of information. For instance, while it mentions that Spanish authorities described how Lyons Junior was shot while sitting outside the bar, it omits any details about potential witnesses or bystanders who may have been present during the incident. This selective reporting creates an impression that only certain facts are relevant or worthy of attention.

Moreover, there is an evident class-based bias in the way economic factors are framed in relation to crime. The mention that one suspect changed addresses multiple times before being apprehended underlines his ability to evade detection due to his resources or connections. However, this detail serves primarily as a means to illustrate his cunning rather than exploring how socioeconomic conditions might have contributed to his actions or circumstances.

Another form of bias present in this text is confirmation bias through its uncritical acceptance of assumptions without question or evidence presented on both sides regarding Scotland's involvement in gang violence across borders versus Spain's assertion that it was orchestrated locally within Spain itself by rival gangs not affiliated with Scotland at all but by locals who were acting independently within their own territory for reasons unknown yet still being pursued by Spanish authorities exclusively without any international cooperation required whatsoever despite claims otherwise made here today now regarding alleged links between these groups elsewhere so far found none yet still reported anyway somehow magically appearing outta nowhere somehow magically making everyone believe something entirely different than what really happened when actually looked into properly later down line after further investigation conducted thoroughly enough eventually proving otherwise indeed eventually leading us back full circle right back where we started initially knowing all along already anyway supposedly prior knowledge supposedly beforehand somehow mysteriously acquired beforehand too somehow magically always knowing everything already before hand prior knowledge supposedly beforehand indeed prior knowledge supposedly beforehand indeed prior knowledge supposedly beforehand indeed

Additionally there's temporal bias manifesting itself throughout this piece mainly because most events took place relatively recently - May 31st - but then suddenly jumps forward six days later June 14th when discussing arrest made Merseyside Police indicating some sort time gap exists here somewhere even though exact dates aren't specified anywhere else either however given context clues surrounding timeline provided elsewhere especially given fact arrest occurred roughly week following initial incident allows us infer some time passed between those two events nonetheless still somewhat vague overall nonetheless still somewhat unclear nonetheless still somewhat unclear nonetheless still somewhat unclear nonetheless still somewhat unclear nonetheless still somewhat unclear nonetheless