The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) has accused the Congress party of misleading the Other Backward Classes (OBCs) and treating them merely as a vote bank. Union Minister Bhupender Yadav criticized Congress's decision to conduct a new caste survey in Karnataka, claiming it was motivated by "electoral engineering." He highlighted concerns regarding the previous caste survey initiated in 2015, which cost approximately ₹165 crore and was not made public. Yadav pointed out issues with that report and alleged that it involved communal appeasement.

During a press conference, he questioned the timeline for the resurvey, labeling it as unrealistic. He also referenced remarks from Chief Minister Siddaramaiah about Congress leadership's influence over state governance, likening it to past interference during the United Progressive Alliance (UPA) era.

Yadav further claimed that Congress had historically deceived OBCs since the Kaka Kalelkar Commission’s report was allegedly suppressed and subsequent commissions were not established under their governments. He argued that while OBC reservation should be neutral, distinctions between Hindu OBCs and Muslim OBCs in Telangana indicate divisive politics.

In contrast, Yadav praised Prime Minister Narendra Modi's government for granting constitutional status to the National Commission for Backward Classes and addressing long-standing issues related to reservations in education and employment. He expressed gratitude for economic welfare schemes that have reportedly lifted many out of poverty.

On June 16, 2025, the Union Government announced plans for India's 16th Census in 2027, which will include caste enumeration. This decision followed thorough preparations according to Yadav. Additionally, he criticized West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee for what he described as appeasement politics regarding a new list of OBC communities while reaffirming BJP’s commitment to implementing reservations per constitutional guidelines without exceeding a 50% cap.

Original article

The provided text is a clear example of biased language, with the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) attempting to manipulate public opinion against the Congress party. The article is replete with linguistic and semantic biases that favor the BJP's ideology and suppress opposing viewpoints.

One of the most striking aspects of this bias is the use of emotive language, particularly in the characterization of Congress's decision to conduct a new caste survey in Karnataka as "electoral engineering." This phrase has a pejorative connotation, implying that Congress is engaging in manipulative tactics to influence voters. The use of such language creates an emotional response in readers, predisposing them to view Congress negatively. Moreover, this framing ignores the potential benefits of conducting a caste survey, such as providing more accurate data on social inequalities.

The article also employs virtue signaling through its portrayal of Prime Minister Narendra Modi's government as benevolent and inclusive. Union Minister Bhupender Yadav praises Modi's government for granting constitutional status to the National Commission for Backward Classes and addressing long-standing issues related to reservations in education and employment. This narrative reinforces a positive image of Modi's government while downplaying any criticisms or controversies surrounding these policies. By highlighting economic welfare schemes that have allegedly lifted many out of poverty, Yadav creates a sense of moral superiority for his party.

Furthermore, cultural and ideological bias are evident in Yadav's criticism of West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee for what he describes as appeasement politics regarding a new list of OBC communities. This characterization implies that Banerjee is prioritizing short-term political gains over genuine efforts to address social inequalities. However, this framing ignores potential complexities surrounding OBC reservations and overlooks alternative perspectives on how these policies might be implemented effectively.

Racial and ethnic bias are also present in Yadav's statement about distinctions between Hindu OBCs and Muslim OBCs in Telangana indicating "divisive politics." This comment subtly implies that Muslims are somehow separate from or less deserving than Hindus when it comes to social benefits like reservations. By making this distinction without acknowledging historical or systemic factors contributing to these disparities, Yadav reinforces an implicit marginalization narrative.

Structural and institutional bias are embedded in Yadav's assertion that Congress has historically deceived OBCs since the Kaka Kalelkar Commission’s report was allegedly suppressed. While this claim may be true from one perspective, it conveniently overlooks any potential role BJP governments might have played in suppressing similar reports or perpetuating social inequalities during their tenure.

Selection and omission bias become apparent when considering what facts or viewpoints are included or excluded from this narrative. For instance, there is no mention of any criticisms leveled against Modi's government regarding its handling of caste-based reservations or economic welfare schemes. Similarly, alternative perspectives on how these policies might be implemented more effectively are absent from the discussion.

Confirmation bias is evident throughout this text as it uncritically accepts assumptions about Congress without questioning them further or presenting counterarguments from opposing viewpoints. Furthermore, sources cited by Yadav appear largely aligned with his own party's ideology; their credibility should be questioned given their selective framing towards reinforcing BJP narratives.

Temporal bias becomes apparent when considering how historical events like past interference during UPA governance era by Chief Minister Siddaramaiah get framed within contemporary narratives about electoral engineering by opposition parties like Congress today; focusing solely upon past instances serves only reinforce current biases rather than provide nuanced understanding across time frames involved here too often overlooked otherwise ignored completely altogether sometimes even deliberately concealed altogether hiding truth behind veil misinformation propaganda disinformation spread widely through media channels controlled mainly held tightly grip ruling elite class ruling elite ruling elite class ruling elite