The district administration in Kochi has implemented a ban on various aerial activities near the airport, specifically within a five-kilometre radius. This prohibition includes the operation of microlight aircraft, aero models, paragliders, unmanned aircraft systems (UAS), powered hang gliders, laser beams, and hot-air balloons. The decision was made following concerns raised by the airport director and the District Police Chief regarding potential safety risks to aircraft operations.

The primary aim of this ban is to ensure safe landing and take-off procedures for flights at Kochi airport. In light of this new regulation, the public has been encouraged to report any sightings or operations of these restricted devices to local authorities.

Original article

The provided text exhibits several forms of bias and language manipulation, which will be thoroughly analyzed below.

One of the most apparent biases is the linguistic and semantic bias, particularly in the use of emotionally charged language. The phrase "various aerial activities" creates a sense of excitement and freedom, while "ban" and "prohibition" evoke a sense of restriction and control. This dichotomy sets up a clear narrative that the ban is necessary to ensure safety, rather than presenting a more nuanced discussion of the issue. The use of words like "restricted devices" also creates a negative connotation, implying that those who engage in these activities are somehow deviant or irresponsible.

Furthermore, the text employs framing and narrative bias through its story structure. The decision to implement the ban is presented as a response to concerns raised by airport officials, creating an implicit narrative that these officials are acting in good faith to protect public safety. However, this framing overlooks potential counterarguments or alternative perspectives on the issue. For instance, one might question whether the ban is overly broad or whether it unfairly restricts legitimate recreational activities.

The text also exhibits cultural and ideological bias through its assumption about what constitutes safe landing and take-off procedures for flights at Kochi airport. This assumption is rooted in Western worldviews about aviation safety, which prioritize efficiency and control over other considerations such as accessibility or environmental impact. The omission of alternative perspectives on aviation safety reinforces this narrow worldview.

Additionally, there is an implicit class-based bias in the text's emphasis on ensuring safe landing and take-off procedures for flights at Kochi airport. This focus on commercial air travel implies that other forms of aerial activity are less important or less deserving of consideration. This reinforces existing power dynamics between those who have access to commercial air travel (typically wealthier individuals) and those who do not.

The selection and omission bias in this text is also noteworthy. By excluding any discussion of potential economic benefits or drawbacks associated with banning various aerial activities near Kochi airport, the text presents a one-sided narrative that prioritizes safety above all else. Similarly, there is no mention of potential alternatives to banning these activities altogether.

Structural and institutional bias can be seen in the way local authorities are encouraged to report sightings or operations of restricted devices without any mention of accountability mechanisms for these authorities themselves. This reinforces existing power dynamics between citizens (who must report suspicious activity) and state institutions (which hold significant authority).

Confirmation bias can be detected in how certain facts are presented without question or critical evaluation within this text's context – specifically regarding concerns raised by airport officials regarding potential risks from various aerial activities near Kochi Airport operations; however it does not provide evidence supporting such claims beyond their assertions alone; thus reinforcing unchallenged assumptions inherent within their viewpoints expressed here instead challenging them critically elsewhere prior reaching conclusions drawn upon based solely off given information provided within article itself without external corroboration sought out elsewhere outside confines original statement made initially before jumping conclusions prematurely drawn afterwards afterwards