Kashmiri students studying in Iran have been relocated from Tehran to safer areas due to escalating violence in the region. Reports indicate that around 600 students from Jammu and Kashmir were successfully moved to Qom, a city deemed safer amid ongoing Israeli airstrikes targeting Tehran. Parents expressed their concerns for those still studying in other cities, particularly as communication becomes increasingly difficult with weakened internet services.

Students reported hearing loud explosions and experiencing anxiety due to the threat of missile strikes. A spokesperson for the Jammu and Kashmir Students Association confirmed that students from several universities had been evacuated on June 16, 2025, but noted that some students in cities like Shiraz had not yet been relocated. The situation has prompted calls for further assistance from Indian authorities to ensure all stranded students are evacuated safely.

Local police urged families of any stranded individuals in Iran to reach out for support, emphasizing the need for timely action as conditions continue to deteriorate.

Original article

The provided text exhibits a multitude of biases, ranging from cultural and ideological to linguistic and semantic. One of the most striking aspects is the implicit nationalism and framing of the situation through a Western-centric perspective. The text assumes that the reader is already aware of the geopolitical context, particularly with regards to Israel's airstrikes on Tehran, without providing any background information or explanation. This omission creates a sense of urgency and danger, which serves to emphasize the need for evacuation and assistance from Indian authorities.

Furthermore, the text employs virtue signaling by highlighting the concerns of parents for their children studying in Iran, while simultaneously downplaying or omitting any potential risks or complexities associated with relocating students from one country to another. The use of phrases such as "escalating violence" and "threat of missile strikes" creates an atmosphere of fear and anxiety, which serves to justify the evacuation efforts without critically examining alternative perspectives or potential consequences.

The text also exhibits cultural bias by framing Kashmiri students as vulnerable victims in need of assistance from Indian authorities. This framing reinforces a paternalistic narrative that positions Indian authorities as guardians responsible for protecting their citizens abroad. The emphasis on "stranded students" implies that they are unable to take care of themselves, reinforcing stereotypes about South Asian cultures being collectivist rather than individualistic.

In terms of linguistic bias, the text employs emotionally charged language throughout, using words like "anxiety," "explosions," and "missile strikes" to create a sense of drama and urgency. The use of passive constructions such as "students reported hearing loud explosions" obscures agency and responsibility, implying that events are happening independently rather than being caused by specific actors or actions.

The selection and omission bias in this text is also noteworthy. For instance, there is no mention of Iranian government responses or policies regarding foreign students during times of conflict. Similarly, there is no discussion about potential economic or social implications for Kashmiri students who may be forced to leave their studies due to these circumstances. These omissions create an incomplete picture that reinforces a particular narrative direction – namely that Indian authorities are solely responsible for ensuring their citizens' safety abroad.

Structural bias is evident in how systems of authority are implicitly defended without critical examination. The text presents Indian authorities as benevolent actors working tirelessly to ensure their citizens' safety without questioning their motivations or actions. This reinforces existing power dynamics between India's central government and its citizens living abroad.

Confirmation bias is also present throughout this text as it accepts assumptions about Israeli airstrikes on Tehran without questioning them further. There is no attempt made to provide alternative perspectives on these events or examine potential biases within news sources reporting on this issue.

Framing bias can be seen in how certain facts are presented out-of-order within this narrative structure – specifically when discussing student evacuations versus those still stranded in other cities like Shiraz – creating an impression that some areas have been prioritized over others based solely on perceived danger levels rather than actual needs assessments conducted locally by relevant parties involved (e.g., local police).

Lastly temporal bias manifests itself through presentism where current events dictate historical narratives surrounding Kashmiri student evacuations; erasing historical contexts which might contextualize contemporary situations better if examined more thoroughly before jumping into immediate action plans proposed here today