Two individuals from Tirupati were arrested by the Chittoor urban police in connection with a series of auto-rickshaw thefts across the district. The police recovered three stolen auto-rickshaws and spare parts valued at approximately ₹11 lakh. The investigation intensified following multiple reports of motor vehicle thefts under the jurisdiction of the One and Two town police stations in Chittoor corporation limits.

Superintendent of Police V.N. Manikanta Chandolu and Deputy SP T. Sainath established a special team, led by Circle-Inspector Maheshwar, to locate the suspects. Acting on a tip-off, authorities apprehended Kondala Adinarayana, aged 38, in Chittoor city, followed by the arrest of his accomplice, Chinnangari Shanmugam, aged 47, in Tirupati. Both suspects were subsequently remanded into custody for further legal proceedings.

Original article

The provided text appears to be a neutral report on a series of auto-rickshaw thefts in Chittoor district, but upon closer examination, several biases and manipulations become apparent. One of the most striking biases is the cultural and ideological bias rooted in nationalism. The text presents the police as heroes who have successfully apprehended suspects and recovered stolen vehicles, which reinforces a narrative of law and order being maintained by the state. This framing assumes that the police are always acting in the best interests of society, without questioning their methods or potential biases. The use of phrases such as "special team" and "acting on a tip-off" creates a sense of excitement and urgency, which serves to reinforce this nationalist narrative.

Furthermore, the text exhibits linguistic and semantic bias through its use of emotionally charged language. The phrase "series of auto-rickshaw thefts" creates a sense of drama and importance, while also implying that these thefts are somehow exceptional or noteworthy. The use of words like "arrested," "apprehended," and "remanded into custody" also creates a sense of severity and gravity, which serves to emphasize the importance of law enforcement actions. This type of language manipulation can influence readers' perceptions by creating an emotional response rather than presenting facts objectively.

The text also displays structural and institutional bias by implicitly defending systems of authority. The mention of Superintendent V.N. Manikanta Chandolu's name alongside Deputy SP T. Sainath's establishes their credibility as authoritative figures in maintaining law and order. This reinforces the notion that those in positions of power are trustworthy agents who work for the greater good, without questioning potential power imbalances or corruption within institutions.

In addition to these biases, there is also an omission bias present in this text regarding racial or ethnic bias against marginalized groups within India's lower castes or lower socioeconomic classes who might be more likely to engage in petty crimes due to economic necessity rather than malice.

Another notable aspect is confirmation bias where certain assumptions about criminal behavior are accepted without question or evidence presented from multiple perspectives.

Moreover, there is framing bias evident through story structure where information about stolen vehicles being recovered is presented first followed by details about arrests reinforcing an interpretation that emphasizes successful policing action over any other factors such as socio-economic conditions driving crime rates.

Lastly regarding data-driven claims made here like recovery value (₹11 lakh), it would be beneficial if source was cited for its credibility but given absence we can't evaluate technological data-driven claims made here