A 40-year-old assistant at the Vishnu Murthy temple in Thrissur, Kerala, named Arun T.A., was arrested for allegedly sexually assaulting a 38-year-old woman from Bengaluru. The woman, who works as a field executive at a private firm, visited the temple seeking divine intervention following her husband's death. Arun reportedly told her that someone had performed black magic against her and offered to conduct a pooja to ward off evil.

After taking her contact number, he began to harass her through sexual video calls. During one of her visits to the temple, he allegedly assaulted her and threatened to perform black magic on her two children if she did not comply with his demands for sexual favors. He also recorded the incident and used it as leverage for further harassment.

The woman confided in relatives about her ordeal and subsequently filed a complaint with the police on June 13. Following this complaint, authorities arrested Arun on June 16.

Original article

The provided text is a news article about the arrest of a temple assistant, Arun T.A., for allegedly sexually assaulting a woman who visited the temple seeking divine intervention. Upon analyzing the text, it becomes evident that various forms of bias and language manipulation are present.

One of the primary biases detected in the text is cultural and ideological bias rooted in Western worldviews. The article frames the incident as a heinous crime committed by an individual in a position of authority, highlighting the power imbalance between Arun and the victim. This framing is reminiscent of Western feminist discourse, which often emphasizes individual agency and personal responsibility in cases of sexual assault. However, this narrative may not account for cultural nuances or traditional power dynamics within Indian society. The article's focus on individual culpability rather than systemic or cultural factors reinforces this Western-centric perspective.

Furthermore, linguistic and semantic bias are evident in the use of emotionally charged language to describe Arun's actions. Words such as "allegedly," "sexually assaulted," and "harassment" create a sense of outrage and moral indignation, which can be seen as manipulative rhetorical framing. This type of language can influence readers' perceptions and elicit an emotional response without providing nuanced context or encouraging critical thinking.

The text also exhibits structural and institutional bias by implicitly defending systems of authority within Indian temples. The article presents Arun's actions as an anomaly rather than an indication of broader systemic issues within these institutions. This omission allows readers to maintain their trust in these institutions without questioning their internal mechanisms or accountability structures.

Additionally, selection and omission bias are apparent in the way certain facts are presented while others are left out. For instance, there is no mention of any potential consequences for Arun beyond his arrest or any measures taken by temple authorities to prevent similar incidents in the future. This selective reporting creates an incomplete narrative that focuses solely on Arun's culpability without considering broader implications or potential reforms.

Economic and class-based bias are also present through subtle suggestions about social status and privilege. The victim is described as a field executive at a private firm from Bengaluru, implying her relative wealth and education compared to Arun's role as a temple assistant from Thrissur (Kerala). While this information might be relevant to understanding social dynamics within India, it inadvertently reinforces class-based stereotypes about access to resources, opportunities, or justice.

Racial and ethnic bias manifest through implicit marginalization by omitting perspectives from marginalized communities affected by similar incidents within Indian temples or other institutions with similar power structures. By not engaging with these perspectives or acknowledging potential systemic issues beyond individual culpability, the article inadvertently perpetuates existing power imbalances.

Confirmation bias is evident in how certain assumptions about human nature are accepted without question: that individuals who abuse positions of authority will inevitably be caught; that victims will always report crimes; or that law enforcement will always act swiftly upon complaints filed against perpetrators like Arun T.A.. These assumptions reinforce simplistic narratives about human behavior while neglecting complexities surrounding consent culture norms around consent culture norms around sexual violence

Framing narrative biases emerge when examining how specific details were ordered throughout this story structure – particularly focusing on describing events leading up-to-arrest date instead discussing aftermaths after-arrest date could potentially lead readers toward assuming justice has been served fully even though investigations remain ongoing