India has initiated the relocation of its citizens from Tehran to safer locations within Iran amid escalating tensions in the Israel-Iran conflict. The Indian Embassy in Tehran, working alongside local Iranian authorities, began this operation on June 16, 2025. The focus is primarily on relocating Indian students from several medical universities in Tehran due to intensified missile and drone attacks between Israel and Iran.

Buses have been organized to transport students from institutions such as Tehran University of Medical Sciences and Islamic Azad University. Officials have advised these students to utilize the bus services for their safety. There are plans for further relocations from other universities, including Shahid Beheshti University and Urmia University near the Turkish border.

Given the current situation, where air evacuation is not feasible due to closed airspace over Iran, officials are considering maritime evacuation options through Bandar Abbas port. Additionally, there may be potential overland routes via Iran's northern borders with Azerbaijan and Armenia or even through Afghanistan’s eastern border.

The Indian government has been actively collecting information about its citizens in Iran through online forms to facilitate this process. As tensions continue to rise with ongoing military actions reported on both sides, ensuring the safety of Indian nationals remains a priority for officials involved in managing this crisis.

Original article

The provided text appears to be a neutral report on the relocation of Indian citizens from Tehran to safer locations within Iran due to escalating tensions in the Israel-Iran conflict. However, upon closer examination, several biases and manipulations become apparent.

One of the most striking biases present in the text is cultural and ideological bias, specifically nationalism. The text assumes that the safety of Indian nationals is a priority for officials involved in managing this crisis, without questioning or critically evaluating this assumption. This assumption is rooted in a nationalist worldview that prioritizes the interests of one's own nation-state over others. Furthermore, the text frames the relocation as an operation initiated by the Indian Embassy in Tehran "working alongside local Iranian authorities," which subtly reinforces a narrative of cooperation and mutual interest between India and Iran. This framing conceals potential power dynamics at play and glosses over any potential tensions or conflicts between the two nations.

The text also exhibits linguistic and semantic bias through its use of emotionally charged language. Phrases such as "escalating tensions" and "missile and drone attacks" create a sense of urgency and danger, which serves to emphasize the gravity of the situation. This type of language manipulation can influence readers' perceptions and emotions, making them more likely to support or sympathize with certain actions or policies. Additionally, the use of euphemisms like "relocation" instead of "evacuation" softens the tone and implies that this is a voluntary process rather than an emergency response.

Selection and omission bias are also evident in this text. By focusing primarily on relocating Indian students from medical universities in Tehran, while mentioning plans for further relocations from other universities near Turkey's border only briefly, the author creates an impression that these students are particularly vulnerable or at risk. This selective focus conceals other potential concerns or issues related to other Indian nationals living in Iran who may not be students or living near Turkey's border.

Structural bias is also present through implicit defense systems authority or gatekeeping institutions like embassies are left uninterrogated while highlighting their role as facilitators for evacuation efforts without questioning their role within power structures.

Confirmation bias becomes apparent when considering how facts are presented without question; sources cited reinforce narratives favoring wealth corporations socioeconomic narratives supporting wealth accumulation above social welfare concerns.



Framing narrative bias manifests through story structure metaphor usage ordering information nudging readers toward preferred interpretations reinforcing nationalist ideologies emphasizing national security above human lives.



Temporal bias emerges when examining historical context given current situation air evacuation not feasible due closed airspace officials considering maritime evacuation options via Bandar Abbas port implying historical precedence for such actions being taken during times conflict.



Finally linguistic data-driven claims reveal technological data-driven biases when citing sources reinforcing particular narratives directions reinforcing dominant worldviews neglecting marginalized perspectives