A tragic plane crash involving an Air India Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner occurred shortly after takeoff from Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel International Airport, resulting in the loss of 241 lives, including former Gujarat Chief Minister Vijay Rupani. The aircraft crashed into a hostel complex, prompting immediate rescue efforts.

Sheetal Gujar, an official from the State Disaster Response Force (SDRF), detailed the challenges faced during the rescue operations. High temperatures at the crash site made it particularly dangerous for rescuers. Despite these conditions, SDRF personnel bravely entered the building wearing oxygen masks and used wet cloths to protect their hands while lifting victims who had been burned in the incident. Gujar noted that they received essential tools and a rapid deployment of 20 to 30 ambulances to assist with evacuations.

The SDRF played a crucial role in ensuring that those trapped inside were evacuated safely and that injured individuals were transported to hospitals promptly. The team's priority was not only to save lives but also to secure the area and prevent further damage following this devastating event. As investigations continue into this tragedy, it highlights both the risks faced by emergency responders and the profound impact on families affected by such loss.

For ongoing updates regarding this incident, it is advisable to consult trusted local authorities or emergency services frequently.

Original article

The text presented is a news report on a tragic plane crash in India, and upon close analysis, several forms of bias and language manipulation become apparent.

One of the most striking aspects of the text is its cultural and ideological bias, which reflects a distinctly Western worldview. The use of phrases such as "tragic plane crash" and "devastating event" creates an emotional response in the reader, which may not be universally applicable to Indian or other non-Western cultures. This framing assumes a particular set of values and emotional responses that may not be shared by all readers. Furthermore, the emphasis on "rescue efforts" and "emergency responders" reinforces a Western-centric view of crisis management, where individual heroes are often celebrated for their bravery.

The text also exhibits linguistic and semantic bias through its use of emotionally charged language. Words like "tragic," "devastating," and "bravely" create a sense of drama and pathos, which may not be entirely justified by the facts presented. The phrase "prompting immediate rescue efforts" implies that the response was swift and effective, but this narrative is not supported by any concrete evidence. This kind of language manipulation can create an overly simplistic or melodramatic portrayal of events.

In terms of selection and omission bias, the text excludes any mention of potential causes for the crash or any criticisms of Air India's safety record. This omission creates a narrative that focuses solely on the heroism of emergency responders rather than exploring broader systemic issues that may have contributed to the tragedy. By selectively presenting information, the text reinforces a particular interpretation that favors Air India's reputation over critical scrutiny.

The text also exhibits structural and institutional bias through its uncritical portrayal of authority figures. The State Disaster Response Force (SDRF) is depicted as acting with bravery and efficiency without any questioning or critique. This kind presentation reinforces existing power structures without interrogating their accountability or potential biases.

Furthermore, confirmation bias is evident in the way certain assumptions are accepted without question. For example, it is assumed that Vijay Rupani's death was tragic without any exploration of his legacy or impact on Gujarat politics. Similarly, there is no consideration given to alternative perspectives on emergency response strategies or critiques of Air India's safety record.

Framing and narrative bias are also present in the way events are structured to create an emotional impact on readers. The story begins with a dramatic description of the crash followed by details about rescue efforts before shifting to quotes from Sheetal Gujar about challenges faced during operations. This ordering creates an impression that rescue efforts were heroic despite high temperatures at the crash site rather than focusing on systemic issues like heat stress among responders.

Regarding sources cited (none explicitly mentioned), it can be inferred that they likely come from mainstream media outlets with varying degrees left-leaning biases typical within this sector due largely historical ties between corporate interests & progressive ideologies worldwide; however exact nature would depend upon specific publications involved given absence explicit citations here.



Temporal bias manifests itself through presentism – focusing primarily upon immediate aftermath & reactions rather than historical context surrounding aviation industry practices within region concerned; though some general remarks could potentially hint toward broader societal implications if elaborated further.



Lastly technological/data-driven bias does appear indirectly via references made towards rapid deployment & utilization advanced medical tools during evacuations; these elements reinforce notion modern technology plays crucial role saving lives amidst chaos following disaster – reinforcing dominant narratives surrounding technological progressivism