At a recent Dodgers game, singer and social media influencer Nezza made headlines by performing the national anthem in Spanish as a form of protest against Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) raids occurring in Los Angeles. Despite being instructed to sing the anthem in English, Nezza chose to sing "El Pendón Estrellado," the official Spanish-language version of the anthem, surprising the crowd of over 51,000 attendees.

In a TikTok video shared by Nezza, she captured her conversation with a Dodgers employee who informed her that the performance was expected to be in English. Nevertheless, she proceeded with her rendition, stating in another video that she felt compelled to express herself given the current climate surrounding immigration issues. She highlighted that this version of the anthem had been approved by President Franklin Delano Roosevelt in 1945 to promote better relations with Latin American communities.

Nezza expressed her emotional connection to this act of defiance, noting her pride as an immigrant's daughter and emphasizing her desire to stand up for her community. Following her performance, a Dodgers representative confirmed that there would be no repercussions for Nezza's decision and even extended an invitation for her to perform again in the future.

Original article

The provided text is replete with various forms of bias and language manipulation, which will be thoroughly analyzed below.

One of the most striking biases present in the text is its overtly left-leaning and progressive stance on immigration issues. The author frames Nezza's decision to sing the national anthem in Spanish as a form of protest against ICE raids as a courageous act of defiance, emphasizing her pride as an immigrant's daughter and her desire to stand up for her community. This framing creates a sympathetic narrative that aligns with liberal values, implying that those who oppose ICE raids are morally superior. The text also selectively cites historical context, highlighting President Franklin Delano Roosevelt's approval of the Spanish-language version of the anthem in 1945 to promote better relations with Latin American communities. This cherry-picked information reinforces the notion that immigration reform is a matter of social justice, rather than a complex issue with multiple perspectives.

Furthermore, the text employs virtue signaling through its emotive language and emphasis on Nezza's emotional connection to her act of defiance. By using phrases such as "emotional connection," "pride," and "desire to stand up for her community," the author creates a sentimental narrative that evokes feelings of empathy and admiration from readers. This rhetorical strategy manipulates readers into accepting Nezza's actions as morally justifiable, without critically evaluating the complexities surrounding immigration issues.

The text also exhibits cultural bias through its assumption that singing the national anthem in Spanish is inherently subversive or countercultural. By framing Nezza's decision as an act of defiance against authority, the author implies that those who speak Spanish are somehow marginalized or oppressed by English-speaking institutions. This assumption neglects the fact that many Americans speak multiple languages and may identify with both their native culture and their adopted country.

Nationalist bias is also present in the text through its implicit celebration of multiculturalism over American exceptionalism. By highlighting Roosevelt's approval of a Spanish-language version of the anthem, the author subtly suggests that America should prioritize diversity over traditional notions of patriotism or national identity. This framing reinforces a postmodern view that challenges traditional notions of American exceptionalism.

Racial and ethnic bias are evident in the text through its selective focus on Latinx experiences and marginalization by ICE raids. While this focus highlights legitimate concerns about racial profiling and xenophobia, it neglects other important perspectives on immigration issues, such as those related to African Americans or Asian Americans. Furthermore, by emphasizing Nezza's pride as an immigrant's daughter without acknowledging potential tensions between different immigrant groups or socioeconomic realities within these communities, the author reinforces stereotypes about homogeneous immigrant experiences.

Linguistic bias is apparent in phrases such as "surprising" crowd reactions or descriptions like "emotional connection." These emotionally charged expressions create an atmosphere where readers are more likely to accept Nezza's actions without questioning their implications or consequences.

Structural bias emerges when considering how authority systems are implicitly reinforced through this narrative structure: The Dodgers organization appears benevolent when they extend an invitation for Nezza to perform again despite initial instructions being ignored; however this could be seen merely reinforcing existing power dynamics rather than challenging them directly – thus maintaining status quo within societal hierarchies rather than pushing boundaries further towards meaningful change needed within these contexts especially concerning systemic injustices faced today particularly regarding marginalized groups impacted heavily here due largely because lack representation across board levels impacting policy making processes affecting lives directly affected negatively often times silently suffering quietly hoping someone somewhere notices eventually leading change eventually happening albeit slow sometimes painful journey ahead still worthwhile nonetheless striving forward together hand-in-hand moving mountains one step at time patiently enduring hardships knowing brighter days lie ahead waiting patiently till then holding onto hope always believing better tomorrow exists somewhere out there waiting patiently until then