A Saudia Airlines flight, carrying 250 Hajj pilgrims, experienced a technical issue with its landing gear upon arriving at Lucknow’s Chaudhary Charan Singh International Airport. The incident occurred early on a Sunday morning when smoke and sparks were seen coming from the left wheel of flight SV 3112 shortly after it landed. This was attributed to a hydraulic leak that caused the wheel assembly to overheat.

The pilot acted swiftly by stopping the aircraft and notifying air traffic control. Following this, the plane was pushed back to a taxiway where all passengers and crew were safely evacuated. The airport's emergency response team arrived promptly and managed the situation within 20 minutes using foam and water.

Officials noted that had this problem occurred during takeoff, it could have led to a serious incident. The flight had originated from Jeddah and was scheduled to return empty to Saudi Arabia after transporting Hajj pilgrims.

This event came just days after another aviation tragedy involving an Air India plane crash shortly after takeoff in which many lives were lost. For those seeking further details or updates regarding aviation safety or incidents, it's advisable to consult trusted local authorities or news sources regularly for accurate information.

Original article

The provided text is a news article about a Saudia Airlines flight experiencing a technical issue with its landing gear upon arriving at Lucknow's Chaudhary Charan Singh International Airport. Upon close analysis, it becomes evident that the text is replete with various forms of bias and language manipulation.

One of the most striking aspects of the text is its cultural and ideological bias. The article presents a distinctly Western perspective on aviation safety, emphasizing the importance of swift action by the pilot and emergency response team in preventing a potentially catastrophic incident. This framing reinforces a Western-centric worldview, where technological advancements and quick thinking are valorized as key to preventing disasters. In contrast, non-Western perspectives on aviation safety might prioritize community involvement, traditional knowledge, or holistic approaches to risk management. The text's omission of such alternative viewpoints constitutes a form of selection bias.

Furthermore, the article exhibits linguistic and semantic bias through its use of emotionally charged language. Phrases such as "technical issue," "smoke and sparks," and "serious incident" create an atmosphere of tension and urgency, which may influence readers' perceptions of the event's significance. Additionally, the use of passive constructions like "the plane was pushed back to a taxiway" obscures agency and responsibility, potentially downplaying the role of human error or systemic failures in contributing to the incident.

The text also displays economic and class-based bias through its framing of aviation safety as an individualistic concern rather than a collective or systemic issue. By focusing on individual actions (e.g., the pilot's swift response) rather than structural factors (e.g., inadequate maintenance protocols), the article reinforces an ideology that prioritizes individual responsibility over institutional accountability. This narrative direction favors wealthier nations or corporations that can afford advanced technologies and training programs for their pilots.

Moreover, there is racial and ethnic bias present in this material due to how it frames Hajj pilgrims as passive recipients rather than active participants in their own journey experience; they are described solely as passengers who were safely evacuated from an aircraft that experienced technical difficulties while carrying them from Jeddah back home after transporting them to Mecca for Hajj pilgrimage rites. In terms of selection bias regarding sources cited within this material: there isn't any direct reference made towards specific sources; however given context clues we can infer certain assumptions being made about what constitutes reliable information regarding aviation incidents. Regarding confirmation bias: The narrative assumes without question that swift action by pilots followed by prompt evacuation procedures constitute best practices for managing emergencies; yet no counterarguments challenging these assumptions are presented within this piece. Temporal bias manifests itself through historical erasure – specifically regarding past incidents involving similar issues – not being discussed here; instead focusing solely on recent events like Air India plane crash shortly after takeoff which resulted in loss lives but does not provide any deeper context surrounding causes behind such tragedies. Lastly when evaluating data-driven claims within this piece we find no explicit evidence supporting claims made about hydraulic leaks causing wheel assemblies overheating during landing operations although some general statements could imply some level understanding towards mechanics involved