A case of attempted murder was registered against a driver and a passenger who allegedly ran over the feet of a police sub-inspector (SI) during a vehicle inspection in Kochi on June 14, 2025. The incident occurred on the Kalloorkad–Nagapuzha Road when Sub-Inspector Muhammed E.M. approached a parked car that appeared suspicious. As the SI approached, the driver reportedly reversed the vehicle suddenly, injuring the officer's leg and shoulder before fleeing the scene.

The SI, who was on patrol duty at the time, suffered significant injuries including a fractured ankle. The accused were charged with attempting to murder a police officer and obstructing a public servant from performing their duty. Following this incident, two individuals from Erattupetta were arrested for allegedly aiding in the escape of the driver and passenger by providing them with another vehicle. The arrested individuals have been identified as Shahid, 27, and Rafsal, 24. The primary suspects remain at large as investigations continue into their whereabouts and actions following the incident.

Original article

The given text is a news report about a case of attempted murder against a driver and passenger who allegedly ran over the feet of a police sub-inspector in Kochi, India. Upon close analysis, several forms of bias and language manipulation become apparent.

One of the most striking biases in this text is the linguistic and semantic bias embedded in the use of emotionally charged language. The phrase "attempted murder" creates an immediate sense of severity and gravity, which serves to elicit an emotional response from the reader. This kind of language framing can be seen as manipulative, as it nudges the reader toward a particular interpretation without providing nuanced context. Furthermore, the use of words like "allegedly" creates a subtle distinction between fact and accusation, which can be seen as an attempt to maintain objectivity while still conveying a sense of moral outrage.

The text also exhibits cultural and ideological bias through its framing of authority figures. The police sub-inspector is portrayed as a victim who was simply doing their duty when attacked by reckless individuals. This portrayal reinforces a narrative that law enforcement officials are heroic figures who deserve respect and protection. This kind of framing can be seen as reinforcing nationalist sentiments, where authority figures are elevated above criticism or scrutiny. The text does not provide any context or nuance about potential systemic issues within the police force or broader societal problems that might have contributed to this incident.

The selection and omission bias in this text is also noteworthy. By focusing on the alleged actions of two individuals (the driver and passenger), while mentioning two others (Shahid and Rafsal) only briefly as having aided their escape, creates an imbalance in attention paid to different actors involved in this incident. This selective focus on certain individuals reinforces a narrative that emphasizes individual responsibility over systemic issues or structural factors that might have contributed to this event.

Furthermore, structural and institutional bias are evident in how systems of authority are implicitly defended or left uninterrogated. The text portrays law enforcement officials as innocent victims who were simply doing their job when attacked by reckless individuals without questioning any potential failures within these systems or institutions that might have contributed to this incident.

Additionally, confirmation bias is present throughout this text where assumptions about these individuals' guilt are accepted without question or further evidence provided beyond initial reports from authorities involved with investigation process ongoing at time piece published.



In terms temporal bias specifically related historical erasure present here because there no discussion regarding past incidents similar nature occurred before which could indicate broader societal issue affecting community trust towards law enforcement agencies.



Lastly economic class-based biases appear subtly throughout report particularly when describing Shahid 27-year-old man arrested aiding escape vehicle he described living Erattupetta area suggesting lower socio-economic status whereas other characters mentioned higher socioeconomic backgrounds thus reinforcing existing power dynamics within society