A national-level faculty development programme focused on 'e-Content Development and Outcome-Based Education' commenced at Farook College in Kozhikode on June 16, 2025. This week-long initiative is organized in collaboration with the UGC-Malaviya Mission Teacher Training Centre and SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi. Over 50 teachers from various institutions across Kerala participated in this residential programme, which aims to enhance modern teaching methodologies, content creation, AI integration, and classroom strategies tailored for Generation Z learners.

The keynote address was delivered by A.K. Bakhshi, the founding Vice-Chancellor of PDM University in Haryana. The inaugural event also featured notable attendees including Vimal Rarh, Director of UGC-MMTTC and Professor of Chemistry at SGTB Khalsa College; Gurmohinder Singh, Principal of SGTB Khalsa College; and K.A. Aysha Swapna, Principal of Farook College.

Original article

The provided text appears to be a neutral, informative piece about a faculty development program focused on e-content development and outcome-based education. However, upon closer examination, several biases and manipulative language patterns emerge.

One of the most striking biases is the cultural bias towards Western-style education. The program is organized in collaboration with the UGC-Malaviya Mission Teacher Training Centre and SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, both of which are institutions with strong ties to Western-style education systems. This collaboration reinforces the idea that Western-style education is superior or more desirable, subtly promoting a form of cultural imperialism. The text does not provide any context or critique of this bias, instead presenting it as a neutral fact.

Furthermore, the text exhibits linguistic bias through its use of emotionally charged language. Phrases such as "week-long initiative," "enhance modern teaching methodologies," and "classroom strategies tailored for Generation Z learners" create a sense of excitement and innovation around the program. This language creates a positive emotional association with the program, subtly influencing the reader's perception without providing any concrete evidence or critique.

The text also reveals economic bias through its focus on e-content development and AI integration. The emphasis on these areas suggests that they are considered essential for modern teaching methodologies, implying that institutions without access to these resources are somehow inferior or less capable. This framing reinforces an economic narrative that favors wealthier institutions with greater access to technology.

Structural bias is evident in the way sources are cited in the text. The keynoter address was delivered by A.K. Bakhshi, who is described as "the founding Vice-Chancellor of PDM University in Haryana." This description implies authority and credibility without providing any additional context about Bakhshi's qualifications or expertise in e-content development or outcome-based education.

The omission bias is also present in this section where only one source (Bakhshi) is mentioned while others like Vimal Rarh (Director UGC-MMTTC) and Gurmohinder Singh (Principal SGTB Khalsa College) are mentioned only briefly without their credentials being highlighted which may lead readers to assume they have less authority compared to Bakhshi.

Additionally, temporal bias emerges when considering how historical events shape contemporary educational practices. The text assumes that current educational methods are superior to those used in the past without acknowledging potential historical contexts or power dynamics that may have influenced these changes.

Framing narrative bias can be seen when considering how information presented influences interpretation; for example: 'Outcome-Based Education' sounds like an objective goal but might actually be linked more closely with corporate interests than genuine pedagogical goals - however no such connection gets explored here leaving readers unaware about possible implications behind such seemingly innocuous terms.



Confirmation bias becomes apparent when examining how certain viewpoints get accepted without question; specifically regarding what constitutes effective teaching methods today - there's no exploration into whether alternative perspectives exist beyond those presented at this conference.



Lastly linguistic manipulation occurs via euphemisms ("outcome-based") which obscure agency behind complex technical jargon thereby making it difficult for non-experts (like students & parents) from questioning assumptions embedded within them.



In conclusion every written piece contains some form biases & manipulations hidden beneath surface level neutrality so it’s crucial we remain vigilant & critically evaluate information presented before accepting its veracity