A Kyrgyz couple recently gained attention for their Instagram video praising Delhi, which they described as a "non-viral" side of the city. After spending a week in the Indian capital, they expressed their surprise at its beauty, greenery, and lack of crowds, countering common perceptions that often depict Delhi as chaotic. The couple shared that they were initially warned about the city's intensity but found it to be quite pleasant.

In their video, one member noted that they had not encountered traffic during their stay and highlighted the city's rich history and architecture. They acknowledged both the positive and negative aspects of Delhi but emphasized its vibrant culture and unique charm. The couple advised that while they wouldn't recommend Delhi as a first stop for travelers new to India, those who take the time to adjust might come to appreciate it just as much as they did.

Their video has garnered over 7,000 views along with numerous positive comments from viewers who appreciated their perspective on Delhi's beauty and culture. Many users thanked them for showcasing a more uplifting view of the city amidst prevalent negative narratives often seen online.

Original article

The given text presents a seemingly innocuous account of a Kyrgyz couple's experience in Delhi, but upon closer examination, several biases and manipulative language patterns emerge.

One of the most striking biases is the cultural and ideological bias that favors a Western or non-Western perspective on India. The text describes Delhi as having "greenery" and "lack of crowds," which are characteristics often associated with Western cities. This framing creates a sense of familiarity and comfort for Western readers, while also implying that Delhi is somehow unusual or unexpected in its beauty. This bias is reinforced by the couple's surprise at Delhi's pleasantness, which suggests that they had preconceived notions about the city being chaotic. By presenting this narrative, the text subtly reinforces the idea that India is an exotic and unfamiliar place, rather than a country with its own unique culture and history.

The text also exhibits linguistic and semantic bias through its use of emotionally charged language. The phrase "non-viral" side of the city implies that Delhi has been unfairly maligned by negative narratives online, creating a sense of victimhood around the city. This framing elicits an emotional response from readers, rather than encouraging them to critically evaluate their own assumptions about India. Furthermore, the use of words like "pleasant" and "vibrant" to describe Delhi creates a positive emotional association with the city, without providing concrete evidence to support these claims.

The text also exhibits selection and omission bias by presenting only one perspective on Delhi. While it mentions that some people may have warned them about the city's intensity, it does not provide any counterarguments or alternative viewpoints on why Delhi might be considered chaotic or unpleasant. By omitting these perspectives, the text creates a false narrative that there is only one way to experience Delhi – as a pleasant and beautiful city – rather than acknowledging multiple experiences and opinions.

In terms of structural and institutional bias, the text implicitly defends systems of authority by presenting itself as an objective account from two individuals who have spent time in Delhi. However, this framing ignores power dynamics at play in tourism industries where local voices are often marginalized or excluded from decision-making processes. By presenting themselves as neutral observers rather than participants in these power dynamics, the couple reinforces existing structures of authority without interrogating them.

Furthermore, confirmation bias is evident throughout the text as it accepts assumptions about what constitutes beauty or pleasantness without question. For example, when describing their experience with traffic in Delhi being non-existent during their stay (a claim likely exaggerated), they highlight this aspect without considering alternative explanations such as seasonal variations or specific routes taken during their visit.

Finally, narrative bias emerges through story structure where we see how certain details are emphasized over others to create an overall impression about what kind of place India/India cities can be like for tourists: greenery-filled spots amidst chaos; vibrant culture amidst negativity; etc..