Tensions arose between the Raj Bhavan and the ruling National Conference (NC) in Jammu and Kashmir over the offer of government jobs to the family of Syed Adil Hussain Shah, a local who was killed in a terror attack in Pahalgam. The Lieutenant Governor, Manoj Sinha, visited Shah's family on June 14, 2025, and presented an appointment letter to his wife, Gulnaz Akhter, citing compassionate grounds.

The NC's MLA Tanvir Sadiq expressed discontent with the move, asserting that the job order had already been prepared by the Fisheries Department under the elected government. He emphasized that this demonstrated maturity from their administration and criticized what he perceived as a conflict between statements made by the Lieutenant Governor regarding his role and actions taken regarding job appointments.

In response to Sadiq’s comments, Raj Bhavan clarified that Sinha exercised discretionary powers under Clause 2A of the Jammu and Kashmir Rehabilitation Assistance Scheme of 2022 to appoint Akhter. This clause allows for exceptional circumstances where dependents of civilians killed due to terrorism may be appointed to government positions.

Sadiq further pointed out contradictions in governance stemming from what he described as a dual power system in Jammu and Kashmir. He called for an early restoration of statehood to resolve such issues effectively.

Meanwhile, during his address on June 15, Sinha encouraged people to follow teachings from mystic Kabir and announced plans for declaring Sant Kabir Das Ji Jayanti as a gazetted holiday in Jammu and Kashmir.

Original article

The provided text is replete with various forms of bias and language manipulation, which are skillfully woven into the narrative to present a particular perspective. One of the most striking aspects of the text is its political bias, which leans heavily towards centrist or neutral framing. However, upon closer examination, it becomes apparent that this neutrality is a carefully crafted facade that conceals a distinct ideological slant.

The text begins by presenting a seemingly innocuous event – the Lieutenant Governor's visit to the family of a terror attack victim and his offer of government jobs to them. However, this event is quickly politicized by the National Conference (NC) MLA Tanvir Sadiq, who expresses discontent with the move and criticizes what he perceives as a conflict between statements made by the Lieutenant Governor regarding his role and actions taken regarding job appointments. This framing immediately introduces a power dynamic between two competing political entities – Raj Bhavan and NC – with each side attempting to assert its authority.

Here, we see an example of linguistic bias through emotionally charged language. The use of words like "discontent" and "criticize" creates an adversarial tone that sets up an oppositional dynamic between Raj Bhavan and NC. Furthermore, Sadiq's assertion that this demonstrates "maturity from their administration" implies that Raj Bhavan's actions are somehow immature or impulsive, reinforcing a narrative that one side is more responsible or competent than the other.

Moreover, this framing also reveals structural bias in favor of elected governments over appointed administrators like Lieutenant Governors. The text implies that NC has already prepared job orders for Shah's family under their elected government, suggesting that they have more control over governance matters than Raj Bhavan does. This reinforces an assumption about democratic legitimacy being tied to elected officials rather than appointed administrators.

Raj Bhavan's response attempts to clarify Sinha's discretionary powers under Clause 2A of the Jammu and Kashmir Rehabilitation Assistance Scheme of 2022 but ultimately fails to address Sadiq's concerns about contradictions in governance stemming from what he described as a dual power system in Jammu and Kashmir. Here we see confirmation bias at play where Raj Bhavan accepts assumptions without question or presents one-sided evidence in its defense.

Furthermore, when Sinha encourages people to follow teachings from mystic Kabir during his address on June 15th announcing plans for declaring Sant Kabir Das Ji Jayanti as a gazetted holiday in Jammu and Kashmir; it can be seen as virtue signaling aimed at promoting cultural sensitivity while reinforcing nationalist sentiment through references to local traditions.

Additionally, there are instances of selection bias where certain facts or viewpoints are included or excluded to direct the narrative towards supporting one particular perspective over another; such as excluding any potential arguments against Sadiq’s claims about dual power systems within Jammu & Kashmir governance structures without providing counterarguments from other stakeholders involved such as civil society groups advocating for greater autonomy within these regions etc.,

Lastly when considering linguistic biases such passive constructions obscure agency while emotionally charged language creates emotional resonance amongst readers thereby nudging them toward accepting preferred interpretations presented throughout article e.g., phrases like 'tensions arose' instead 'conflict escalated' subtly shifts reader perception toward viewing situation more negatively against those holding power positions whereas active voice construction would emphasize responsibility among those involved thus altering overall tone & direction taken within piece