In LB Nagar, Hyderabad, a tragic incident occurred when a high-tension electricity wire snapped and fell on two individuals sleeping on the pavement near a temple in Chintalkunta. The victims, a man and a woman believed to be homeless, were electrocuted in the early hours of Sunday. A street dog that was also nearby succumbed to the same fate.

The LB Nagar police reported that the couple was resting along Sagar Ring Road when the live wire came down, resulting in their immediate deaths. Authorities have registered a case and transferred the bodies to Osmania General Hospital for post-mortem examinations. Following the incident, officials from the electricity department conducted an inspection of the scene and initiated an inquiry into how this accident occurred.

Original article

The provided text, a news report on a tragic incident in Hyderabad, India, is replete with various forms of bias and language manipulation. Upon close examination, it becomes evident that the narrative is framed to elicit sympathy and outrage from the reader, while also subtly reinforcing certain cultural and ideological biases.

One of the most striking aspects of the text is its use of emotionally charged language. The phrase "tragic incident" sets a somber tone from the outset, immediately evoking feelings of sadness and concern in the reader. The description of the victims as "a man and a woman believed to be homeless" serves to humanize them and create a sense of pathos. However, this framing also reinforces stereotypes about homelessness being synonymous with poverty and marginalization. This subtle bias assumes that homelessness is inherently tragic or pitiful, rather than acknowledging it as a complex issue with multiple causes.

Furthermore, the text's emphasis on the victims' status as "homeless" serves to reinforce class-based bias. By highlighting their lack of shelter as a defining characteristic, the narrative perpetuates negative stereotypes about people living on the streets. This framing also obscures other important aspects of their lives, such as their agency or resilience in coping with adversity.

The text's use of passive constructions also warrants scrutiny. Phrases like "the live wire came down" obscure agency by attributing blame to an anonymous force rather than specifying who or what was responsible for maintaining or inspecting the electrical infrastructure. This linguistic choice deflects attention away from potential systemic failures or institutional negligence.

In terms of cultural bias, the text's reference to a temple near where the incident occurred introduces an implicit religious framing. While not explicitly stated that religion played a role in this incident (which would be problematic), mentioning its proximity creates an association between spirituality and safety/ danger-free zones – reinforcing traditional notions that sacred spaces are inherently protected from harm.

Another form of bias present in this text is selection and omission bias. By focusing solely on two individuals who were electrocuted while sleeping on pavement near Sagar Ring Road without mentioning any other details about them (e.g., names), we see how specific information can be strategically omitted to create an impression rather than providing comprehensive context.

Moreover, structural and institutional bias are subtly embedded within this narrative when discussing authorities' actions following this accident: Authorities have registered a case... Following which officials from electricity department conducted inspection & initiated inquiry into how accident occurred." Here we observe how institutions involved respond after such incidents often receive more attention than those directly affected by it; thus diverting focus away from addressing root causes toward 'official investigations'.

Lastly considering linguistic semantics employed here reveals further nuances: words like 'tragic', 'electrocuted', & 'immediate deaths' all contribute towards creating vivid imagery but these very same words can evoke different reactions depending upon individual experiences & perspectives; therefore implying certain emotional responses over others based solely upon word choice constitutes another form linguistic manipulation employed within given passage