A Father's Day cake priced at an astonishing Rs 5 lakh recently went viral, capturing widespread attention on social media. This unusual incident occurred on June 15, coinciding with the celebration of Father's Day. The cake in question was a 500-gram Hazelnut Chocolate Cake listed on a food delivery app, which stood out dramatically against the backdrop of typical cake prices ranging from Rs 400 to Rs 599 for other options like Butterscotch and Red Velvet cakes.

The viral screenshot was first shared by a user on X (formerly Twitter), prompting numerous reactions and discussions online. Many users speculated whether the exorbitant price was due to a technical glitch or if it represented an actual luxury item. Comments flooded in, with some users humorously pointing out that for the price of this single cake, one could purchase multiple cakes or even high-end electronics like iPhones.

In addition to the outrageous price tag, there were claims that the delivery fee for this cake was over Rs 80,000. The incident sparked curiosity and laughter across various platforms as people engaged in light-hearted banter about the situation.

Original article

The article presents a fascinating case of a Rs 5 lakh Hazelnut Chocolate Cake that went viral on social media. At first glance, the text appears to be a lighthearted and humorous account of an unusual incident. However, upon closer examination, several biases become apparent. One of the most striking biases is linguistic and semantic bias, particularly in the use of emotionally charged language. The phrase "astonishing" to describe the cake's price sets a tone that is both sensational and judgmental, implying that such an expense is unreasonable or even laughable. This framing primes the reader to view the situation as absurd or outrageous, rather than as a legitimate business transaction.

Furthermore, the text exhibits economic and class-based bias by framing the cake's price as exorbitant and outlandish. The comparison to typical cake prices ranging from Rs 400 to Rs 599 serves to emphasize the perceived extravagance of the Hazelnut Chocolate Cake. This framing reinforces a narrative that wealthier individuals are indulging in unnecessary luxuries, while neglecting to consider alternative perspectives on value or luxury items. The comment about purchasing multiple cakes or high-end electronics for the same price also perpetuates this narrative, implying that such expenditures are frivolous and wasteful.

Selection and omission bias are also evident in this article. By focusing solely on this one instance of an expensive cake, the text creates an impression that such prices are anomalous or exceptional within this particular food delivery app's offerings. However, it is possible that other items on this platform may have equally high prices without receiving similar attention from users or media outlets. Furthermore, there is no mention of any potential context for why this particular cake might be priced so high (e.g., unique ingredients, exclusive production methods), which could provide additional insight into its value proposition.

A related form of bias present in this article is structural and institutional bias regarding authority systems within online marketplaces like food delivery apps. By presenting no information about how these platforms operate internally (e.g., pricing algorithms used by vendors), we can infer an implicit acceptance of their authority structures without question or critique.

Confirmation bias also plays a role here: readers who already assume online marketplaces should prioritize affordability over exclusivity will find their views reinforced by this narrative; those who hold different assumptions may dismiss it as trivialized gossip about wealthy individuals' spending habits.

Framing and narrative bias can be seen through story structure: beginning with an attention-grabbing anecdote followed by reactions from social media users creates suspense before eventually resolving into humorously pointing out absurdities surrounding luxury items' pricing strategies – all reinforcing our preconceived notions about wealth disparities between consumers seeking indulgence versus those more concerned with budgetary prudence