A former manager of Hearts, Craig Levein, disclosed that he recently underwent triple heart bypass surgery. This decision followed a heart attack he experienced while coaching at Tynecastle and subsequent health issues, including shortness of breath and limited mobility. After consulting with medical professionals, Levein opted for the bypass over additional stents, which he felt were not suitable for him.

During his hospital stay, Levein encountered unusual experiences attributed to the medication he was prescribed. He described moments of delirium where he believed he witnessed a nativity play and even saw what he thought was the devil in another ward cubicle. Despite these unsettling episodes, Levein expressed relief at feeling more like himself post-surgery.

Levein has had a long association with Hearts as both a player and manager across two separate tenures. Most recently, he managed St Johnstone but left his position after the club faced relegation despite efforts to maintain their Premiership status. Reflecting on his time there, Levein acknowledged challenges such as injuries and disciplinary issues affecting team performance but maintained that improvements were evident in their gameplay.

Now recovering from surgery, Levein is preparing to co-host a new podcast series titled "Sacked in the Morning" alongside Amy Irons.

Original article

The article about Craig Levein's heart bypass surgery and subsequent experiences is a nuanced text that, upon closer examination, reveals various biases. One of the most striking aspects of the article is its cultural bias, which leans heavily towards a Western, specifically Scottish, perspective. The text assumes familiarity with Scottish football culture and terminology, such as "Tynecastle" and "Premiership status," without providing context or explanation for non-Scottish readers. This assumption reinforces a narrow cultural frame that prioritizes Scottish experiences over others.

Furthermore, the article exhibits linguistic bias through its use of emotionally charged language. The description of Levein's delirium episodes as "unsettling" and his relief at feeling more like himself post-surgery creates a narrative tone that evokes sympathy and empathy from the reader. This emotive framing influences the reader's interpretation of Levein's experiences, nudging them towards a more positive assessment of his situation. Additionally, the use of words like "relief" and "more like himself" implies that Levein's recovery is not only physical but also emotional and psychological.

The article also reveals selection bias in its presentation of sources. While it mentions Levein's association with Hearts as both a player and manager across two separate tenures, it does not provide any information about his time at St Johnstone beyond his recent departure due to relegation. This omission creates an imbalance in the narrative, highlighting Levein's positive contributions to Hearts while downplaying any potential challenges or controversies surrounding his tenure at St Johnstone.

In terms of structural bias, the article reinforces traditional notions of authority by presenting medical professionals as experts who have guided Levein towards making informed decisions about his health care. However, this framing does not interrogate power dynamics within healthcare systems or consider alternative perspectives on medical treatment options. Instead, it perpetuates a paternalistic view that positions medical professionals as benevolent authorities who prioritize patients' well-being above all else.

Moreover, the article exhibits confirmation bias in its acceptance of certain assumptions without question or evidence-based critique. For instance, when discussing Levein's decision to opt for bypass surgery over additional stents due to concerns about suitability for him personally," there is no critical evaluation provided regarding potential biases within medical decision-making processes or alternative perspectives on this choice." This lack of scrutiny reinforces existing power structures within healthcare systems while ignoring potential counter-narratives.

Furthermore,the text presents temporal bias through its focus on present-day events (Levein's surgery) without considering historical context or broader implications for future generations."This myopic focus neglects potential lessons from past medical advancements or long-term consequences for individuals undergoing similar procedures."

Additionally,the language used in describing Craig Levien’s experience reveal gendered assumptions rooted in traditional roles."When describing Levien’s recovery process ,the text states he was “preparing to co-host”a podcast series alongside Amy Irons,this framing implies Levien’s role is secondary to Irons’, reinforcing patriarchal norms where men are often seen as primary breadwinners."

Finally,the selection and omission bias evident throughout this piece demonstrates how certain facts viewpoints sources are included excluded to direct narrative toward preferred interpretation.”For example ,the author chooses not mention any negative aspects regarding Craig Levien’s tenure at St Johnstone club instead focusing solely on challenges injuries disciplinary issues affecting team performance .