In Hong Kong, a shift is occurring among younger fathers who are increasingly eager to forge deeper connections with their children. However, they often encounter obstacles such as demanding work schedules and traditional societal expectations that have historically defined fatherhood. Allen Ha Wing-on, co-founder of the DADs Network, noted that while many modern dads wish to be more involved in parenting, they struggle to balance their professional responsibilities with meaningful family time.

The organization has been advocating for a more engaged role for fathers over the past decade. Ha emphasized that traditional views often confine fathers to being primarily financial providers rather than active participants in their children's lives. This disconnect can lead to weaker relationships between fathers and their children, particularly as both parents and kids navigate busy schedules filled with work commitments and extracurricular activities.

Recognizing that fathers do not typically form community support networks like mothers do, Ha established the DADs Network in 2015. The organization aims to create opportunities for dads to connect through various activities designed for father-child bonding. As Father's Day approaches, this initiative highlights an ongoing cultural evolution in Hong Kong regarding paternal involvement in family life.

Original article

The provided text exhibits a range of biases that shape its narrative and reinforce certain values. One of the most apparent biases is cultural and ideological, as the text presents a Western, middle-class perspective on fatherhood. The emphasis on "deeper connections" between fathers and children, as well as the focus on balancing work and family responsibilities, reflects a cultural narrative that prioritizes individualism and emotional expression. This bias is reinforced by the use of language such as "forging deeper connections," which implies a level of emotional intimacy that may not be universally applicable.

Furthermore, the text assumes a traditional nuclear family structure, with two parents (one male, one female) and children. This assumption is implicit in the discussion of "father-child bonding" and "parenting," which neglects non-traditional family arrangements such as single-parent households or same-sex couples. This omission perpetuates a narrow definition of family that excludes diverse experiences and reinforces heteronormative norms.

The text also exhibits linguistic and semantic bias through its use of emotionally charged language. Phrases such as "obstacles," "demanding work schedules," and "traditional societal expectations" create a sense of urgency and moral imperative around changing traditional notions of fatherhood. This language frames modern dads who want to be more involved in parenting as heroic figures struggling against oppressive societal forces, rather than simply individuals making choices about their own lives.

In terms of selection and omission bias, the text selectively presents sources to support its narrative about modern dads wanting to be more involved in parenting. The quote from Allen Ha Wing-on serves to illustrate this point, but it is unclear whether Ha's views represent a representative sample or whether other perspectives are being excluded from consideration. The lack of counter-narratives or alternative viewpoints creates an unbalanced picture that reinforces the dominant ideology.

Structural bias is also present in the form of implicit assumptions about authority structures. The DADs Network is presented as an organization advocating for change within existing social systems (i.e., demanding work schedules), rather than challenging these systems themselves. This framing reinforces existing power dynamics by suggesting that change can be achieved through individual effort rather than systemic transformation.

Confirmation bias is evident in the way the text accepts assumptions without question or presents one-sided evidence to support its claims about modern dads wanting to be more involved in parenting. For example, there is no discussion about potential drawbacks or unintended consequences of increased paternal involvement in parenting; instead, we are presented with an unproblematic narrative about dads wanting to spend more time with their kids.

Framing bias is also at play through the ordering of information within the article's structure. By presenting Allen Ha Wing-on's views first followed by supporting details from his organization (the DADs Network), we get an impression that his perspective represents mainstream thinking on this issue when it might not necessarily reflect broader public opinion.

Regarding temporal bias, there appears to be presentism at play here since this article does not provide historical context regarding how societal expectations around fatherhood have evolved over time; instead focusing solely on contemporary shifts towards greater paternal involvement without acknowledging possible precursors or parallel developments elsewhere worldwide.

Finally regarding data-driven/technological claims – none are explicitly made within this piece but if any were included they would likely need scrutiny for potential methodological flaws given how easily data can sometimes serve ideological purposes